Inhibition of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase influence microbiota and metabolomic profile in pancreatic cancer xenograft mice

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-43561/v2

Download PDF

Research note

Inhibition of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase influence microbiota and metabolomic profile in pancreatic cancer xenograft mice

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-43561/v2

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 18 Nov, 2020

Read the published version in BMC Research Notes →

You are reading this latest preprint version

Objective: Despite recent advances in treatment options, pancreatic cancer remains the most deadly major cancer. Targeting metabolism represents an emerging anti-cancer strategy.

Results: Metagenomic 16S analysis was employed to explore the effect of Dichloroacetate (DCA) on the composition of the fecal microbiota and metabolomic profile was assessed on in vivo pancreatic cancer mouse xenograft model. Pancreatic cancer xenograft mice displayed a shift of microbiota’ profile as compared to control mice without DCA treatment and a significant decrease of the purine bases inosine xanthine together with their metabolically-related compound hypoxanthine were observed in the DCA treated group as compared to the control group. Two aminoacids methionine and aspartic acid resulted decreased and increased respectively. DCA affects tumor environment and studies are needed in order to understand whether DCA supplementation could be supportive as synergistic approach to enhance the efficacy of existing cancer treatments in pancreatic cancer patients.

Food Science & Technology

Pancreatic cancer

microbiota

metabolomic

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most aggressive and highly lethal tumor ranked as the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide and it is expected to become the second leading cause of cancer death in the next decade. Despite recent advances in treatment options, pancreatic cancer has the worst survival rate of any organ site, with a median survival of less than six months and a 5-year survival rate of less than 5% [1]. Due to the lack of early symptoms and biomarkers that can predict the onset of PC, the latter is often not diagnosed until it is advanced and therefore is habitually referred to as a "silent killer". The available therapeutic strategies based on surgery and conventional chemotherapy are still essentially insufficient. Since metabolic reprogramming contributes to tumor development, targeting identified metabolic targets might represent a promising effective approach to treat pancreatic cancer, overcome chemoresistance and ameliorate patient's prognosis and survival [2].

It is well known that tumor cells rely on glucose and glycolysis as a major source of energy [3] hence there is also a growing interest in fasting or calories restriction to prevent or treat cancer [4, 5]. It was previously demonstrated that rewiring carbohydrates metabolism differentially affects survival of pancreatic cancer cell lines [3] or retard pancreatic cancer tumor growth in pancreatic cancer in vivo model [6]. Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (PDK) is one of the key enzyme which increases the flux of pyruvate into the mitochondria, promoting glucose oxidation over glycolysis through the inactivation of pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) hence PDK1 inhibition by the generic drug orally available small molecule dichloroacetate (DCA) increasing pyruvate oxidation and oxidative stress contributes to cell death could represent a potential metabolic-targeting therapy for cancer [7]. We recently demonstrated that DCA-treated PANC-1 and BXPC-3 cells showed a marked decrease in cell proliferation and migration combined with an enhanced ROS production resulting in a mitigation of tumor growth in pancreatic cancer xenografted mice [8].

Being DCA an effective modulator of glucose metabolism, in this manuspcript we assessed the effect of DCA on microbiota and metabolomic profile on the above mentioned in vivo model of pancreatic cancer xenografted mice.

Animal studies

All mice were housed and cared for in a GenScript facility accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International (AAALAC International). A total number of 5×10⁶ BxPC‐3‐luc cancer cells per mouse was suspended in 0.1 mL of PBS/ matrigel mixture (1:1) and then injected into 5-6 weeks old female Nu/Nu mice (right flank) maintained in a specific pathogen-free (SPF) environment throughout the experiments. BxPC‐3‐luc tumor‐bearing nude mice were randomly assigned into 2 groups (6 mice/ group) when tumor size reached an average volume of 100 mm³. Group 1 (Normal saline, i.p, qw), group 2 (DCA, 100 mg/kg/day free drinking). Animals were humanely euthanized by CO2.

Microbiota analyses

DNA was extracted from mice’ fecal samples using stool DNA extraction kits (Qiagen, Milan, Italy) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and PCR amplification of the V3-V4 hypervariable regions of 16S rRNA genes was performed using universal Illumina adapters: forward primer: 5′TCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGCCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG; reverse primer: 5’GTCTCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGGACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC, as reported in Klindworth et al. [9] and [10]. The amplified region of about 450 bp and in average 12000 reads per sample was obtained. The mixture of amplicons was sequenced using Illumina MiSeq 2x250 v2 platform. Sequences were demultiplexed based on index sequences and FASTQ files were generated. Sequence data were analyzed as already described [6] using an open source program (BION-meta). Briefly, sequences were trimmed at both ends using a cut-off for minimum quality of 95%, and then reads shorter than 350 bp were removed. Consensus reads were clustered based on a minimum seed similarity of 99.5% and then taxonomically aligned to the reference 16S rDNA database (SILVA) using a match minimum of 90%.

LC-MS analysis of serum metabolomics

Serum proteins were precipitated using acetonitrile. The supernatant was diluted 1:1 in a acetonitrile/milliQ water mixture. Liquid chromatography/Mass spectrometry was used to analyze serum metabolites. The samples were analyzed using a slightly modified version of the acidic protocol (positive and negative ionization) described by Paglia et al. [11]. For quality control, a mixed pooled sample was created by taking a small aliquot from each sample. A targeted approach was used to extract the response of compounds included in a standard list of 97 compounds.

Data processing

Data were processed using Compound Discoverer 3.0 (ThermoFisher Scientific). In short features (a feature is a peak characterized by one mass and one retention time) were first extracted from the raw data. One compound may give a signal in more than one mass trace (e.g. naturally occurring C13 isotopes, adducts, and fragments) a compound will therefore almost always be represented by more than one feature with the same retention time but different masses. The feature detection is followed by grouping of features belonging to the same compound. This additional information (e.g. isotope pattern) is then used together with the accurate mass to determine the molecular formula. The mass and molecular formula is then used to perform a search in a suitable database using ChemSpider.

Statistical analysis

In vitro and in vivo results are expressed as means ± SE. Comparisons were made using Student’s t-test. Differences were considered as significant when P < 0.05 (*) or P < 0.01 (**).

Effect of DCA on microbiota profile of PC xenograft mice

Beside the trend in retarding tumor growth without reaching statistical significance (Figure 1A) as previously published [11], DCA treatment did not have significant effect on the fecal microbiota on the phylum level and the two main phyla were Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes with lower abundance of Proteobacteria and Verrucomicrobia (average abundances: 39, 38, 17 and 5 %, and 58, 24, 17 and 1 % in control and DCA mice, respectively). However, at the family, genus or species level DCA treatment led to several shifts on the microbiota. DCA treated mice can be characterized by dominance of Lachnospiraceae (32 vs 16 % in DCA and control mice, respectively) and Ruminococcaceae (22 vs 10 % in DCA and control mice, respectively). More specifically, there were three genera abundant in DCA mice but absent in control group such as Ruminiclostridium 9 (6 % from total population), Lachnospiraceae cluster UCG-008 (3.5 %) and Ruminococcaceae cluster UCG-003 (3.3 %). Less pronounced but significant increase was also observed in bacteria belonging to Anaerotruncus (5 and 2 %, respectively) (Figure 1B). All these changes mentioned above were conversely observed in case of gemcitabine treatment as published previously [12]. The only bacteria observed only in control group were genus Coprococcus 1 although this was low abundant genus (0.3%). Also but not significantly Lactobacillus animalis representing about 4% of the bacterial abundance in controls was only 1 % in treated animals. Similarly, bacteria belonging to Aeromonas were more abundant in control group (1.3 vs 0.3 %, respectively).

Metabolomic profile in DCA treated xenograft mice

Serum samples collected from both control and DCA-treated animals were collected to evaluate the metabolomic profile. Using a targeted approach, A total of 38 out of 97 compounds were detected (Figure 2). Among these compounds, a significant decrease of the purine bases inosine xanthine together with their metabolically-related compound hypoxanthine were observed in the DCA treated group as compared to the control group. Two aminoacids methionine and aspartic acid resulted decreased and increased respectively.

The study of the microbiota has attracted increasing attention during the last decade since it has become clear that the composition and function of this ecological community of commensal, symbiotic and pathogenic microorganisms affect several physiological and pathological processes, including cancer [13]. Although microbiota is relatively stable over time [14] it can be easily modified by a number of environmental factors, such as lifestyle, diet and drugs [15, 16, 17]. The current study shows that DCA treatment led to several shifts on the microbiota in particular at family, genus or species level in pancreatic cancer xenograft mice. Above all, DCA treatment significantly increased the relative abundance of Lachnospiraceae. Several species from Lachnospiraceae are fiber degrading and butyrate producing bacteria, hence, they might have beneficial effects on cancer inhibition. Butyrate has shown anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects not only in pancreatic cancer cells but also in different cancer cell lines together with anti-angiogenic properties [18, 19]. Moreover, butyrate inhibits pancreatic cancer cells vitro invasion by altering integrin expression [20]. Host metabolic phenotype is impacted by the interaction between bacteria and the host. For this reason we performed a metabolomics targeted analysis of mice serum. Beside the decreased level of inosine, xanthine and hypoxantine that we discussed in our previous work [12] we also observed a decreased level of the essential aminoacid methionine.

Inosine, which is a naturally occurring metabolite of adenosine, possesses anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive properties and has a protective effect against LPS-induced inflammation [21]. Interestingly, decreased levels of inosine could also be due to the microbiota itself, since it has been reported that Lactobacillus reuteri impacts inosine levels [22]. As for methionine, several studies showed that methionine restriction also inhibits aging-related disease processes in mice and inhibits colon carcinogenesis in rats [23] and in humans, methionine restriction could be achieved through a plant-based diet [24]. In conclusion, these data suggest a role for DCA on tumor environment and more studies are needed in order to understand whether DCA supplementation could be supportive as synergistic approach to enhance the efficacy of existing cancer treatments in pancreatic cancer patients.

The current study reports that DCA administration affects gut microbiota and metabolomic profiles of pancreatic cancer xenograft mice. Future investigations are needed in order to understand whether DCA supplementation could be supportive as synergistic approach to enhance the efficacy of existing cancer treatments in pancreatic cancer patients.

PC: Pancreatic cancer; DCA: Dichloroacetate; Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (PDK); Pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH).

Conflict of interest

No competing interest is declared.

Author Contributions:

Conceived the study: VP. Designed the experiments: KA, RV and VP. Performed the experiments: VP and KA. Analyzed the data: KA, RV and VP. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: KA, RV and VP. Wrote the paper: KA and VP.

Funding

This research was supported by the ‘‘Ricerca Corrente RC2018-2020’’ funding granted by the Italian Ministry of Health to VP and also by European Regional Development Fund to Competence Center of Food and Fermentation Technologies (EU48667) and Institutional Research Funding to Tallinn University of Technology (IUT 19-27) of the Estonian Ministry of Education and Research. VP is supported by Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) under IG 2019 - ID. 23006 project.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated and analyzed during this study will be freely available to any scientist wishing to use them for non-commercial purposes upon reasonable request.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Animal work was conducted in accordance with protocols reviewed and approved by GenScript's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC approval number is ANM14-002/468862). All mice were housed and cared for in a GenScript facility accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International (AAALAC International).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

[1] Siegel RL, Miller KD and Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015; 66:7-30

[2] Luengo A, Gui DY, Vander Heiden MG. Targeting Metabolism for Cancer Therapy. Cell Chem Biol. 2017 Sep 21;24(9):1161-1180

[3] Tataranni T, Agriesti F, Ruggieri V, Mazzoccoli C, Simeon V, Laurenzana I, Scrima R, Pazienza V, Capitanio N, Piccoli C. Rewiring carbohydrate catabolism differentially affects survival of pancreatic cancer cell lines with diverse metabolic profiles. Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 20;8(25):41265-41281

[4] D'Aronzo M, Vinciguerra M, Mazza T, Panebianco C, Saracino C, Pereira SP, Graziano P, Pazienza V. Fasting cycles potentiate the efficacy of gemcitabine treatment in in vitro and in vivo pancreatic cancer models. cancer models. Oncotarget. 2015 Jul 30;6(21):18545-57

[5] Lee C, Longo VD. Fasting vs dietary restriction in cellular protection and cancer treatment: from model organisms to patients. Oncogene. 2011 Jul 28; 30(30):3305-16.

[6] Panebianco C, Adamberg K, Adamberg S, Saracino C, Jaagura M, Kolk K, Di Chio AG, Graziano P, Vilu R, Pazienza V. Engineered Resistant-Starch (ERS) Diet Shapes Colon Microbiota Profile in Parallel with the Retardation of Tumor Growth in In Vitro and In Vivo Pancreatic Cancer Models. Nutrients. 2017 Mar 27;9(4). pii: E331. doi: 10.3390/nu9040331

[7] Michelakis ED, Webster L, Mackey JR. Dichloroacetate (DCA) as a potential metabolic-targeting therapy for cancer. Br J Cancer. 2008 Oct 7;99(7):989-94

[8] Klindworth A, Pruesse E, Schweer T, Peplies J, Quast C, Horn M and Glockner FO. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 41(1):e1.

[9] Pindjakova J, Sartini C, Lo Re O, Rappa F, Coupe B, Lelouvier B, Pazienza V, Vinciguerra M. Gut Dysbiosis and Adaptive Immune Response in Diet-induced Obesity vs. Systemic Inflammation. Front Microbiol. 2017 Jun 22;8:1157. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01157.

[10] Paglia G, Williams JP, Menikarachchi L, Thompson JW, Tyldesley-Worster R, Halldorsson S, Rolfsson O, Moseley A, Grant D, Langridge J, Palsson BO and Astarita G. Ion mobility derived collision cross sections to support metabolomics applications. Anal Chem. 2014; 86(8):3985-3993

[11] Tataranni T, Agriesti F, Pacelli C, Ruggieri V, Laurenzana I, Mazzoccoli C, Della Sala G, Panebianco C, Pazienza V, Capitanio N, Piccoli C. Dichloroacetate Affects Mitochondrial Function and Stemness-Associated Properties in Pancreatic Cancer Cell Lines. Cells 2019, 8(5), 478; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8050478

[12] Panebianco C, Adamberg K, Jaagura M, Copetti M, Fontana A, Adamberg S, Kolk K, Vilu R, Andriulli A, Pazienza V. Influence of gemcitabine chemotherapy on the microbiota of pancreatic cancer xenografted mice. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2018 Apr;81(4):773-782.

[13] Zitvogel L, Galluzzi L, Viaud S, Vetizou M, Daillere R, Merad M and Kroemer G. Cancer and the gut microbiota: an unexpected link. Sci Transl Med. 2015 Jan 21;7(271):271ps1. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3010473

[14] Clemente JC, Ursell LK, Parfrey LW and Knight R. The impact of the gut microbiota on human health: an integrative view. Cell. 2012; 148(6):1258-1270

[15] Singh RK, Chang HW, Yan D, Lee KM, Ucmak D, Wong K, Abrouk M, Farahnik B, Nakamura M, Zhu TH, Bhutani T, Liao W. Influence of diet on the gut microbiome and implications for human health. J Transl Med. 2017 Apr 8;15(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12967-017-1175-y

[16] Klement RJ, Pazienza V. Impact of Different Types of Diet on Gut Microbiota Profiles and Cancer Prevention and Treatment. Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Mar 29;55(4).

[17] Panebianco C, Andriulli A, Pazienza V. Pharmacomicrobiomics: exploiting the drug-microbiota interactions in anticancer therapies. Microbiome. 2018 May 22;6(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0483-7

[18] Natoni F, Diolordi L, Santoni C and Gilardini Montani MS. Sodium butyrate sensitises human pancreatic cancer cells to both the intrinsic and the extrinsic apoptotic pathways. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005; 1745(3):318-329

[19] Blank-Porat D, Gruss-Fischer T, Tarasenko N, Malik Z, Nudelman A and Rephaeli A. The anticancer prodrugs of butyric acid AN-7 and AN-9, possess antiangiogenic properties. Cancer Lett. 2007; 256(1):39-48

[20] Farrow B, Rychahou P, O'Connor KL and Evers BM. Butyrate inhibits pancreatic cancer invasion. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003; 7(7):864-870

[21] Hasko G, Kuhel DG, Nemeth ZH, Mabley JG, Stachlewitz RF, Virag L, Lohinai Z, Southan GJ, Salzman AL, Szabo C. Inosine inhibits inflammatory cytokine production by a posttranscriptional mechanism and protects against endotoxin-induced shock. J Immunol (2000). 164(2):1013–1019

[22] He B, Hoang TK, Wang T, Ferris M, Taylor CM, Tian X, Luo M, Tran DQ, Zhou J, Tatevian N, Luo F, Molina JG, Blackburn MR, Gomez TH, Roos S, Rhoads JM et al (2016) Resetting microbiota by Lactobacillus reuteri inhibits T reg deficiency-induced autoimmunity via adenosine A2A receptors. J Exp Med 214(1):107–123

[23] Komninou D, Leutzinger Y, Reddy BS, Richie JP. "Methionine restriction inhibits colon carcinogenesis". Nutrition and Cancer. (2006) 54 (2): 202–8. doi:10.1207/s15327914nc5402_6.

[24] Cavuoto P, Fenech MF (October 2012). "A review of methionine dependency and the role of methionine restriction in cancer growth control and life-span extension". Cancer Treatment Reviews. 38 (6): 726–36. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.01.004. PMID 22342103

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 18 Nov, 2020

Read the published version in BMC Research Notes →

Editorial decision: Accept
09 Nov, 2020
Review #1 received at journal
04 Nov, 2020
Reviewers invited by journal
22 Oct, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed at journal
22 Oct, 2020
Editor assigned by journal
16 Oct, 2020
Submission checks completed at journal
15 Oct, 2020
Editor invited by journal
15 Oct, 2020

You are reading this latest preprint version

Inhibition of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase influence microbiota and metabolomic profile in pancreatic cancer xenograft mice

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 2

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Materials And Methods

Results

Discussion

Limitations

List of Abbreviations

Declarations

References

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 2