1. Graham-Rowe, D. Agriculture: Beyond food versus fuel. Nature. 2011;474:S6–S8.
2. Nonhebel S. Energy yields in intensive and extensive biomass production systems. Biomass Bioenergy. 2002;22:159–167.
3. Heaton EA, Clifton-Brown J, Voigt TB, Jones MB, Long SP. Miscanthus for renewable energy generation: European Union experience and projections for Illinois. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change. 2004;9:433–451.
4. Jones MB, Finnan J, Hodkinson TR. Morphological and physiological traits for higher biomass production in perennial rhizomatous grasses grown on marginal land. GCB Bioenergy. 2015;7:375–385.
5. Stewart JR, Toma Y, Fernández FG, Nishiwaki A, Yamada T, Bollero G. The ecology and agronomy of Miscanthus sinensis, a species important to bioenergy crop development, in its native range in Japan: a review. 2009;1(2):126–153.
6. Clifton-Brown JC, Stampfl PF, Jones MB. Miscanthus biomass production for energy in Europe and its potential contribution to decreasing fossil fuel carbon emissions. Global Change Biology. 2004;10(4):509 − 18.
7. Pauly M, Keegstra K. Cell-wall carbohydrates and their modification as a resource for biofuels. The Plant Journal. 2008;54:559 − 68.
8. Somerville C, Youngs H, Taylor C, Davis SC, Long SP. Feedstocks for lignocellulosic biofuels. Science. 2010;329:790–792.
9. Glowacka K. A review of the genetic study of the energy crop Miscanthus. Bio Bio. 2011;35:2445–2454.
10. Caslin B, Finnan J. Miscanthus energy crop. Energy Fact Sheet. 2016: 9.
11. Clifton-Brown J, Chiang Y, Hodkinson TR. Miscanthus: Genetic Resources and Breeding Potential to Enhance Bioenergy Production Aspect Appl Biol. 2008;65:239–248.
12. Heaton EA, Flavell RB, Mascia PN, Thomas SR, Dohleman FG, Long SP. Herbaceous energy crop development: recent progress and future prospects. Curr Opin Biotech. 2008;19:202–209.
13. Jorgensen U. Genotypic variation in dry matter accumulation and content of N, K and Cl in Miscanthus in Denmark. Biomass Bioenerg. 1997;12:155 − 69.
14. Hodkinson TR, Chase MW, Renvoize, SA. Genetic resources of Miscanthus. Aspec of Appl Biol. 2001;65:239–248.
15. Swaminathan K. Alabady MS. Varala K, De Paoli E, Ho I, Rokhsar DS, et al. Genomic and small RNA sequencing of Miscanthus × giganteus shows the utility of sorghum as a reference genome sequence for Andropogoneae grasses. Genome Biology. 2010;11:R12.
16. Beale CV, Long SP. Can perennial C4 grasses attain high efficiencies of radiant energy-conversion in cool climates, Plant Cell Environ. 1995;18: 641–650.
17. Maughan M, Bollero G, Lee DK, Darmody R, Bonos S, Cortese L, Murphy J, Gaussoin R, Sousek M, Williams D, Williams L, Miguez F, Voigt T. Miscanthus x giganteus productivity: the effects of management in different environments. GCB Bioenergy. 2012;4:253–265.
18. Clifton-Brown J, Lewandowski I. Overwintering problems with newly established Miscanthus plantations can be overcome by identifying genotypes with improved rhizome cold tolerance. New Phytologist. 2000;148, 287–294.
19. Weng JH. Photosynthesis of different ecotypes of Miscanthus spp. as affected by water stress. Photosynthetica. 1993;29: 43–48.
20. Malinowska M, Donnison, IS, Robson PRH. Phenomics analysis of drought responses in Miscanthus collected from different geographical locations. GCB Bioenergy. 2017;9: 78–91.
21. Ings J, La M, Bosch M. Physiological and growth responses of water deficit in the bioenergy crop Miscanthus x giganteus. Front Plant Sci. 2013;4(468).
22. Nie G, Huang L, Xiao Ma X, Ji Z, Zhang Y, Lu Tang L, Zhang X. Enriching genomic resources and transcriptional profile analysis of Miscanthus sinensis under drought stress based on RNA sequencing. Int J Geno. 2017;2017.
23. Song Z, Xu Q, Lin, C, Tao C, Zhu C, Xing S, et al. Transcriptomic characterization of candidate genes responsive to salt tolerance of Miscanthus energy crops GCB Bioenergy. 2017;9:1222–1237.
24. Wang Q, Kanga L, Lin C, Song Z, Tao C, Liu W, et al. Transcriptomic evaluation of Miscanthus photosynthetic traits to salinity stress. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2019;125:123–130.
25. Da Costa RMF, Simister R, Robers LA, Timms-Taravella E, Cambler AB, Corke FMK, et al. Nutrient and drought stress: implications for phenology and biomass quality in miscanthus. Ann Bot. 2018; 124(4):553–566.
26. Donnison IS, Fraser MD. Diversification and use of bioenergy to maintain future grasslands. Food Ene Sec. 2016;5: 67–75.
27. Whitlow TH, Bassuk NL, Ranney TG, Reichert DL. An improved method for using electrolyte leakage to assess membrane competence in plant tissues. Plant Physiol. 1992;98:198–205.
28. Leopold AC, Musgrave ME, Williams KM. Solute leakage resulting from leaf desiccation. Plant Physiol. 1981;68:1222–1225.
29. Richter GM, Riche AB, Dailey AG, Gezan SA, Powlson DS. Is UK biofuel supply from Miscanthus water-limited? Soil Use Manag. 2008;24:235–245.
30. Yan J, Chen W, Luo F, Ma H, Meng A, Li X, et al. Variability and adaptability of Miscanthus species evaluated for energy crop domestication. GCB Bioenergy. 2012;4:49–60.
31. Slatyer RO. Studies of the water relations of crop plants grown under natural rainfall in northern Australia. Aus J Agri Res 1955;61:365–377.
32. Varoquauxa N, Colec B, Gaod C, Pierrozd G, Bakerd CR, Pateld D, et al. Transcriptomic analysis of field-droughted sorghum from seedling to maturity reveals biotic and metabolic responses. PNAS. 2019;116 (52):27124–27132.
33. Santelia D, Trost P, Sparla F. New insights into redox control of starch degradation. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2015; 25: 1–9.
34. Thalmann M, Pazmino D, Seung D, Horrer D, Nigro A, Meier T, et al. Regulation of leaf starch degradation by abscisic acid is important for osmotic stress tolerance in plants. Plant Cell. 2016; 28 (8) 1860–1878
35. Zanella M, Borghi GL, Pirone C, Thalmann M, Pazmino D, Costa A, et al. β-amylase 1 (BAM1) degrades transitory starch to sustain proline biosynthesis during drought stress. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2016;67(6):1819–1826.
36. Liang X, Zhang L, Natarajan SK, Becker DF. Proline mechanisms of stress survival. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2013;19(9):998–1011.
37. Quigley F, Rosenberg JM, Shachar-Hill Y, Bohnert HJ. From genome to function: the Arabidopsis aquaporins. Genome Biol 3, research0001.1 (2001).
38. Maurel C, Verdoucq L, Luu DT, Santoni V. Plant Aquaporins: Membrane channels with multiple integrated functions. Annual Review of Plant Biology 2008 59:1, 595–624.
39. Alexandersson E, Fraysse L, Sjövall-Larsen S, Gustavsson S, Fellert M, Karlsson M, et al. Whole Gene Family Expression and Drought Stress Regulation of Aquaporins. Plant Mol Biol. 2005; 59:469–484.
40. Fetter K, Van Wilder V, Moshelion M, Chaumont F. Interactions between plasma membrane aquaporinsmodulate their water channel activity. Plant Cell. 2004; 16:215–228.
41. Singh A, Giri J, Kapoor S, Tyagi AK, Pandey GK. Protein phosphatase complement in rice: genome-wide identification and transcriptional analysis under abiotic stress conditions and reproductive development BMC Genomics. 2010;11:435.
42. Yang Q, Liu K, Niu X, Wang Q, Wan Y, Yan F, et al. Genome-wide identification of PP2C genes and their expression profiling in response to drought and cold stresses in Medicago truncatula. Sci Rep. 2018;8(12841).
43. Perera IY, Hung CY, Moore CD, Stevenson PJ, Boss WF. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing the Type 1 Inositol 5-Phosphatase exhibit increased drought tolerance and altered abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell. 2008;20:2876–2893.
44. Ranieri A, Bernardi R, Lanese P, Soldatini GF. Changes in free amino acid content and protein pattern of maize seedlings under water stress. Env Exp Bot. 1989;29(3):351–357.
45. Martinelli T, Whittaker A, Bochicchio A, Vazzana C, Suzuki A, Céline Masclaux-Daubresse C. Amino acid pattern and glutamate metabolism during dehydration stress in the ‘resurrection’ plant Sporobolus stapfianus: a comparison between desiccation-sensitive and desiccation-tolerant leaves. J Exp. Bot. 2007;58(11):3037–3046.
46. Batista-Silva W, Heinemann B, Rugen N, Nunes-Nesi A, Araújo WL, Braun H, Hildebrandt TM. The role of amino acid metabolism during abiotic stress release. Plant Cell Env. 2019;42:163–1644.
47. Gugger PF, Peñaloza-Ramírez1 JM, Wright JW, Sork VL. Whole-transcriptome response to water stress in a California endemic oak (Quercus lobata). Tree Physio. 2016;37:632–644.
48. Fracasso A, Trindade LM, Amaducci S. Drought stress tolerance strategies revealed by RNA-Seq in two sorghum genotypes with contrasting WUE. BMC Plant Biol 2016;16(115).
49. Chaichi M, Sanjarian F, Razavi K, Gonzalez-Hernandez JL. Analysis of transcriptional responses in root tissue of bread wheat landrace (Triticum aestivum L.) reveals drought avoidance mechanisms under water scarcity. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(3).
50. Marondedze C, Thomas L, Gehring C, Lilley KS. Changes in the Arabidopsis RNA-binding proteome reveal novel stress response mechanisms. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19(139):2–11.
51. Sanchez-Rodriguez E, Moreno DA, Ferreres F, Rubio-WilhelmiMdel M, Ruiz JM. Differential responses of five cherry tomato varieties to water stress: Changes on phenolic metabolites and related enzymes. Phytochemistry. 2011;72:723–729.
52. Nichols SN, Hofmann, RW, Williams, WM. Physiological drought resistance and accumulation of leaf phenolics in white clover interspecific hybrids. Environ Exp Bot 2015;119:40–47.
53. Nakabayashi R, Yonekura-Sakakibara K, Urano K, Suzuki M, Yamada Y, Nishizawa, T, et al. Enhancement of oxidative and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis by overaccumulation of antioxidant flavonoids. Plant J. 2014;77:367–379.
54. Kirakosyan A, Seymour E, Kaufman PB, Warber S, Bolling S, Chang SC. Antioxidant capacity of polyphenolic extracts from leaves of Crataegus laevigata and Crataegus monogyna (hawthorn) subjected to drought and cold stress. J Agric Food Chem. 2003;51:3973–3976.
55. SAS Institute Inc. 2014. SAS/STAT® 13.2 User’s Guide. Cary, NC
56. Andrews, S. FastQC. A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. 2018. http://www.bioinformatics. babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc. Accessed 17 Jul 2020.
57. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;170:2114–2120.
58. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics, 2013;29:15–21.
59. Conesa A, Götz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Talón M, Robles M, Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 2005;21:3674–3676.
60. De Vega JJ, Teshome A, Klaas M, Grant J, Finnan J, Barth S. R code used in "Physiological and transcriptional response to drought stress among bioenergy grass Miscanthus species" (Version 1). Zenodo. (2020, July 17)http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3950495
61. Pertea M, Pertea GM, Antonescu CM, Chang TC, Mendell JT, Salzberg SL. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33(3):290–295.
62. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biology 2014;15(12):550.
63. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc. 1995;57:289–300.
64. Gehlenborg N. UpSetR: A more scalable alternative to Venn and Euler diagrams for visualizing intersecting sets. 2019. R package version 1.4.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=UpSetR
65. Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag New York, 2009.
66. Alexa A, Rahnenfuhrer J. topGO: Enrichment analysis for gene ontology. 2019. R package version 2.38.1.
67. Goodstein DM, Shu S, Howson R, Neupane R, Hayes RD, Fazo J, et al. Phytozome: a comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:1178–1186.
68. Krishnakumar V, Contrino S, Cheng C, Belyaeva I, Ferlanti ES, Miller JR, et al. A warehouse for Arabidopsis data integration and discovery. Plant Cell Physio, 2016;58:1.
69. Kanehisa M, Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:27–30.