(1) McGarr O. A review of podcasting in higher education: its influence on the traditional lecture. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 2009;25(3):309-321.
(2) Cardall S, Krupat E, Ulrich M. Live lecture versus video-recorded lecture: are students voting with their feet? Acad Med 2008 Dec;83:1174-1178.
(3) Branet P, Cuggia M, LeBeux P. Recording and podcasting of lectures for students of medical school. Studies of Health Technology Informatics 2011;169:248-252.
(4) Fernandes S, Maley M, Cruickshank C. The impact of online recordings on learning outcomes in pharmacology. International Journal of the Association of Medical Science Educators 2008;18:62-70.
(5) Millis RM, Dyson S, Cannon D. Association of classroom participation and examination performance in a first-year medical school course. Adv Physiol Educ 2009; 33:139-143.
(6) Figlio DN, Rush M, Yin L. Is it live or is it internet? Experimental estimates of the effects of online instruction on student learning. 2010;16089.
(7) Schreiber BE, Fukuta J, Gordon F. Live lecture versus video podcast in undergraduate medical education: A randomised controlled trial. BMC Med Educ 2010; 10:68-6920-10-68.
(8) Paul S, Pusic M, Gillespie C. Medical student lecture attendance versus iTunes U. Med Educ 2015; 49:530-531.
(9) Eisen DB, Schupp CW, Isseroff RR, Ibrahimi OA, Ledo L, Armstrong AW. Does class attendance matter? Results from a second-year medical school dermatology cohort study. Int J Dermatol 2015; 54:807-816.
(10) Means B, Toyama Y, Murphy R, Bakia M, Jones K. Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. 2010. U.S. Department of Education Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development: Policy and Program Studies Service. ( https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf)
(11) The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research. 120th American Association of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition; 30: 1-18, 2013. (https://peer.asee.org/22585)
(12) Stockwell BR, Stockwell MS, Cennamo M, Jiang E. Blended Learning Improves Science Education. Cell 2015; 162:933-936.
(13) Evans KH, Thompson AC, O'Brein C, Bryant M, Basaviah P, Prober C, et al. An innovative blended preclinical curriculum in clinical epidemiology and biostatistics: Impact on student satisfaction and performance. Academic Medicine 2016;91:696-700.
(14) O'Conner EE, Fried J, McNulty N, Shah P, Hogg JP, Lewis P, et al. Flipping radiology education right side up. Academic Radiology 2018;23:810-820.
(15) Liebert CA, Lin DT, Mazer LM, Bereknyei S, Lau JN. Effectiveness of the surgery core clerkship flipped classroom: a prospective cohort trial. American Journal of Surgery 2016; 211:451-457.
(16) Belfi LM, Bartolotta RJ, Giambrone AE, Davi C, Min RJ. "Flipping" the introductory clerkship in radiology: impact on student performance and perceptions. Academic Radiology 2015; 22:794-800.
(17) Jensen JL, Kummer TA, Godoy PD. Improvements from a flipped classroom may simply be the fruits of active learning. CBE Life Sciences Education 2015; 14:1-12.
(18) Whillier S, Lystad RP. No differences in grades or level of satisfaction in a flipped classroom for neuroanatomy. Journal of Chiropractic Education 2015; 29:127-133.
(19) Chen F, Lui AM, Martinelli SM. A systematic review of the effectiveness of flipped classrooms in medical education. Medical Education 2017; 51:585-597.
(20) Beihavas V, Bridgman H, Kornhaber R, Cross M. The evidence for 'flipping-out': a systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education. Nurse Education Today 2016; 38:15-21.
(21) Mattick K, Crocker G, Bligh J. Medical student attendance at non-compulsory lectures. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2007; 2:201-210.
(22) Billings-Gagliardi S, Mazor KM. Student decisions about lecture attendance: do electronic course materials matter? Acad Med 2007; 82 (10 Suppl):S73-6.
(23) Davis EA, Hodgson Y, Macaulay JO. Engagement of students with lectures in biochemistry and pharmacology. Biochem Mol Biol Educ 2012; 40:300-309.
(24) Gupta A, Saks NS. Exploring medical student decisions regarding attending live lectures and using recorded lectures. Med Teach 2013; 35:767-771.
(25) Marchand JP, Pearson ML, Albon SP. Student and faculty member perspectives on lecture capture in pharmacy education. Am J Pharm Educ 2014; 78:74. doi: 10.5688/ajpe78474
(26) Westrick SC, Helms KL, McDonough SK, Breland ML. Factors influencing pharmacy students' attendance decisions in large lectures. Am J Pharm Educ 2009; 73:83. doi: 10.5688/aj730583
(27) Zazulia AR, Goldhoff P. Faculty and medical student attitudes about preclinical classroom attendance. Teach Learn Med 2014; 26:327-334.
(28) Ikonne U, Campbell AM, Whelihan KE, Bay RC, Lewis JH. Exodus From the Classroom: Student Perceptions, Lecture Capture Technology, and the Inception of On-Demand Preclinical Medical Education. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2018; 118:813-823.
(29) Deal A. Classroom response systems: A teaching with technology white paper. 2007. (https://www.cmu.edu/teaching/technology/whitepapers/ClassroomResponse_Nov07.pdf)
(30) Collins J. Audience response systems: technology to engage learners. J Am Coll Radiol 2008; 5:993-1000.
(31) Hammen CS, Kelland JL. Attendance and grades in a human physiology course. Am J Physiol 1994; 267(6 Pt 3):S105-8.
(32) Horton DM, Wiederman SD, Saint DA. Assessment outcome is weakly correlated with lecture attendance: influence of learning style and use of alternative materials. Adv Physiol Educ 2012; 36:108-115.
(33) Bollmeier SG, Wenger PJ, Forinash AB. Impact of online lecture-capture on student outcomes in a therapeutics course. Am J Pharm Educ 2010; 74:127. doi: 10.5688/aj7407127
(34) Stegers-Jager KM, Cohen-Schotanus J, Themmen AP. Motivation, learning strategies, participation and medical school performance. Med Educ 2012; 46:678-688.
(35) Freeman S, Eddy SL, McDonough M, Smith MK, Okoroafor N, Jordt H, et al. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering and mathematics. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2014; 111:8410-8415.