This preprint is under consideration at BMC Research Notes. A preprint is a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research note
Nouf S ALMughamis
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5285-6543
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Objective This study aims to report the developmental processes and validation of Attitude Toward Nutrition Questionnaire in Arabic language. Results A total of 173 (response rate= 86.93%) participants responded to the survey. There were a total of 92 (53.2%) nutritionists and 81(46.8%) doctors/surgeons. Principal component analyses revealed followed by visualization of Cattell’s scree plot, suggested a four-factor solution for the 36-item Attitude Toward Nutrition Counselling Questionnaire. Itwas found to have an acceptable validity. These four factors cumulatively explained 37.9% of the variance in the factor structure of the ATNQ. Cronbach’s alpha revealed an acceptable level of reliability for each subscale of the ATNQ. The first subscale named “Factual knowledge about nutrition” comprised of nine items. It yielded a Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.78. The second subscale “knowledge about nutrition in morbidities” comprised of seven items and yielded a Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.71. The third subscale “counselling of patients” comprised of 11 items and yielded a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.68. The fourth subscale comprising nine items yielded a Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.64 and was named, “Dietary programs and supplementation”. Keywords Nutrition, Questionnaire, Scale, knowledge, Dietician, Arabic, Attitude
Keywords
Nutrition, Questionnaire, Scale, knowledge, Dietician, Arabic, Attitude
Figure 1
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Under Review
Version 5
Posted 13 Jan, 2020
No community comments so far
Editor assigned
On 13 Jan, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 12 Jan, 2020
Editor invited
On 12 Jan, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Minor revision
On 07 Jan, 2020
Editor assigned
On 02 Jan, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 01 Jan, 2020
Editor invited
On 01 Jan, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Minor revision
On 30 Dec, 2019
Editor assigned
On 27 Dec, 2019
Submission checks complete
On 26 Dec, 2019
Editor invited
On 26 Dec, 2019
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Minor revision
On 18 Dec, 2019
Review #1 received
Received 17 Dec, 2019
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 05 Dec, 2019
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 04 Dec, 2019
Editor assigned
On 02 Dec, 2019
Submission checks complete
On 01 Dec, 2019
Editor invited
On 01 Dec, 2019
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 08 Nov, 2019
Review #1 received
Received 31 Oct, 2019
Submission checks complete
On 18 Oct, 2019
Editor invited
On 18 Oct, 2019
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 18 Oct, 2019
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 18 Oct, 2019
Editor assigned
On 17 Oct, 2019
First submitted
On 16 Oct, 2019
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Nutrition & Dietetics
Learn more about our company.
This preprint is under consideration at BMC Research Notes. A preprint is a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research note
Nouf S ALMughamis
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5285-6543
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Under Review
Version 5
Posted 13 Jan, 2020
No community comments so far
Editor assigned
On 13 Jan, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 12 Jan, 2020
Editor invited
On 12 Jan, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Minor revision
On 07 Jan, 2020
Editor assigned
On 02 Jan, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 01 Jan, 2020
Editor invited
On 01 Jan, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Minor revision
On 30 Dec, 2019
Editor assigned
On 27 Dec, 2019
Submission checks complete
On 26 Dec, 2019
Editor invited
On 26 Dec, 2019
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Minor revision
On 18 Dec, 2019
Review #1 received
Received 17 Dec, 2019
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 05 Dec, 2019
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 04 Dec, 2019
Editor assigned
On 02 Dec, 2019
Submission checks complete
On 01 Dec, 2019
Editor invited
On 01 Dec, 2019
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 08 Nov, 2019
Review #1 received
Received 31 Oct, 2019
Submission checks complete
On 18 Oct, 2019
Editor invited
On 18 Oct, 2019
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 18 Oct, 2019
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 18 Oct, 2019
Editor assigned
On 17 Oct, 2019
First submitted
On 16 Oct, 2019
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Nutrition & Dietetics
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Objective This study aims to report the developmental processes and validation of Attitude Toward Nutrition Questionnaire in Arabic language. Results A total of 173 (response rate= 86.93%) participants responded to the survey. There were a total of 92 (53.2%) nutritionists and 81(46.8%) doctors/surgeons. Principal component analyses revealed followed by visualization of Cattell’s scree plot, suggested a four-factor solution for the 36-item Attitude Toward Nutrition Counselling Questionnaire. Itwas found to have an acceptable validity. These four factors cumulatively explained 37.9% of the variance in the factor structure of the ATNQ. Cronbach’s alpha revealed an acceptable level of reliability for each subscale of the ATNQ. The first subscale named “Factual knowledge about nutrition” comprised of nine items. It yielded a Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.78. The second subscale “knowledge about nutrition in morbidities” comprised of seven items and yielded a Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.71. The third subscale “counselling of patients” comprised of 11 items and yielded a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.68. The fourth subscale comprising nine items yielded a Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.64 and was named, “Dietary programs and supplementation”. Keywords Nutrition, Questionnaire, Scale, knowledge, Dietician, Arabic, Attitude
Figure 1
Loading...