Integration of sRNA, degradome, transcriptome analysis and functional investigation reveals gma-miR398c negatively regulates drought tolerance via GmCSDs and GmCCS in transgenic Arabidopsis and soybean

doi:10.21203/rs.2.17136/v1

Download PDF

Research article

Integration of sRNA, degradome, transcriptome analysis and functional investigation reveals gma-miR398c negatively regulates drought tolerance via GmCSDs and GmCCS in transgenic Arabidopsis and soybean

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.17136/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 05 May, 2020

Read the published version in BMC Plant Biology →

You are reading this older preprint version

Read the latest preprint version →

Background: Drought conditions adversely affect soybean growth, resulting in severe yield losses worldwide. Increasing experimental evidence indicates miRNAs are important post-transcriptional regulators of gene expression. However, the drought-responsive molecular mechanism underlying miRNA–mRNA interactions remains largely uncharacterized in soybean. Meanwhile, the miRNA-regulated drought response pathways based on multi-omics approaches remain elusive.

Results: We combined sRNA, transcriptome and degradome sequencing to elucidate the complex regulatory mechanism mediating soybean drought resistance. One-thousand transcripts from 384 target genes of 365 miRNAs, which were enriched in the peroxisome, were validated by degradome-seq. An integrated analysis showed 42 miRNA–target pairs exhibited inversely related expression profiles. Among these pairs, a strong induction of gma-miR398c as a hub gene negatively regulates multiple peroxisome-related genes ( GmCSD 1a/b, GmCSD 2a/b/c and GmCCS ). Meanwhile, we detected that alternative splicing of GmCSD1a/b might affect soybean drought tolerance by bypassing gma-miR398c regulation. Overexpressing gma-miR398c in Arabidopsis thaliana L. resulted in decreased percentage germination, increased leaf water loss, and reduced survival under water deficiency, which displayed sensitivity to drought during seed germination and seedling growth. Furthermore, overexpressing gma-miR398c in soybean decreased GmCSD 1a/b, GmCSD 2a/b/c and GmCCS expression, which weakened the ability to scavenge O 2 .− , resulting in increased relative electrolyte leakage and stomatal opening compared with knockout miR398c and wild-type soybean under drought conditions.

Conclusion: The study indicates that gma-miR398c negatively regulates soybean drought tolerance, and provides novel insights useful for breeding programs to improve drought resistance by CRISPR technology.

Plant Molecular Biology and Genetics

miRNA

degradome

transcriptome

gma-miR398c

drought

soybean

Soybean (Glycine max L.) is the most important legume crop that provides essential vegetable proteins and oil sources for livestock and humans, while its production is severely constrained by global climatic changes, particularly drought stress [1]. However, the current lack of knowledge regarding the regulatory network underlying soybean responses to drought conditions has restricted an effective management of soybeans productivity in the world. Therefore, characterizing the complex molecular mechanism of drought resistance is a prerequisite for improving soybean yield [2].

In plants, small RNAs play a prominent regulatory role influencing the adaptability to drought stress, especially microRNAs (miRNAs) via degradation or translational inhibition of their target genes [3]. In the past decade, some differentially expressed miRNAs (DEMs) under drought-simulated stress have been filtered by small RNA sequencing (sRNA-seq), mainly in soybean roots [4, 5]. However, only few miRNAs in soybean, e.g. gma-miR394 and gma-miR396, by overexpressing in model plants have been verified to perform an important function in response to drought stress [6, 7]. As known, miR398 participates in stress resistance by regulating the expression of superoxide dismutase (SOD)-related genes in many plants, such as Arabidopsis thaliana [8], Medicago sativa [9], potato [10], and Oryza sativa [11]. Overexpressing miR398 negatively regulates plant stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and Nicotiana benthamiana [12, 13]. Recently, rice osa-miR398b overexpression plants and mutants in CSD1 and CSD2 were shown to display enhanced basal defenses by altering expression of multiple SODs, indicating that in different plant species miR398 might play different roles in stress resistance [14, 15]. Overall, our understanding of the roles played by miRNAs under drought stress remains limited, especially for seedlings of soybean.

Usually, miRNA researchers combined differentially expressed genes (DEGs) to analyze the regulatory mechanisms in which miRNAs might be involved. In terms of genetic control of drought tolerance, generating hypotheses of quite complex data is a difficult mission, and the accurate identification of targets is necessary. Degradome sequencing (degradome-seq) has been important for identification of global targets of miRNAs, which has helped to clarify the miRNA regulatory network [16]. Recently, a few studies on the integrated analysis of miRNA, degradome and mRNA sequencing have been published in plants [17, 18]. However, the miRNA-target pairs that displayed negative correlations during soybean mosaic virus infection were not obtained using the integrated analysis, probably because of the limitations in the number of miRNA targets and DEGs [19]. Overall, gaining an in-depth understanding of the complex molecular mechanisms of soybean miRNAs in the response to drought stress and strategies for genetic improvement of soybean for drought resistance are still a challenge [20]. Therefore, integration of sRNA, degradome and mRNA sequencing is required to clarify the drought-responsive molecular mechanism to narrow the list of candidate genes, and further functional identification is also indispensable in soybean.

In the present study, we validated 1000 transcripts from 384 target genes of 365 miRNAs, which were enriched in the peroxisome, and 42 miRNA–target pairs exhibited inversely related expression profiles. Among these pairs, gma-miR398 exhibited the function of a hub gene that negatively regulated multiple peroxisome-related genes (COPPER-ZINC SUPEROXIDE DISMUTASE 1 and 2,GmCSD1a/b, GmCSD2a/b/c; and COPPER CHAPERONE FOR SUPEROXIDE DISMUTASE, GmCCS) in soybean subjected to water-deficient conditions. Furthermore, we observed that alternative splicing (AS) of GmCSD1a/b also might affect soybean drought tolerance by bypassing gma-miR398c regulation, and a greater number of target genes of gma-miR398c than those detected in other legumes was identified. Overall, we suggest that gma-miR398c may affect the redox status to reduce soybean drought resistance. These results provide novel insights that may be useful in breeding programs to improve the drought resistance of soybean by CRISPR-mediated gene editing.

Response of miRNAs to drought-simulated stress by sRNA-seq and degradome-seq

To evaluate the drought–responsive miRNA effects of the simulated drought stress conditions on soybean seedlings, sRNA-seq and degradome-seq assays were performed (Table S1). We identified 716 miRNAs for all libraries from control and treated plants, of which 546 miRNAs from 208 families were known miRNAs, and 170 miRNAs were novel miRNAs that were predicted using miRDeep-p (Table S2). Meanwhile, 117 and 99 drought-responsive DEMs in the leaf samples collected at 6 and 12 h were filtered out, respectively. In addition, 144 and 83 DEMs were detected in the root samples harvested at 6 and 12 h, respectively (Table S3).

A total of 1000 transcripts from the degradome-seq data belonging to 384 target genes were cleaved by 365 miRNAs. This total included 755 transcripts from 282 genes targeted by 318 miRNAs in leaves, 651 transcripts from 246 genes targeted by 264 miRNAs in roots, and 144 target genes common to both leaves and roots (Table S4). Notably, several GO terms of 384 target genes may be associated with the response to the simulated drought conditions, including response to water deprivation, response to salt stress, defense response, and oxidation–reduction process (Figure 1A). The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis revealed that the peroxisome pathway was significantly enriched, which included SOD and LONG-CHAIN ACYL-COA LIGASE (ACSL) genes (Figure 1B). Analysis of GO term enrichment (Fisher’s test, P < 0.05) using the REVIGO software revealed a number of significantly enriched GO terms, including superoxide dismutase activity (GO:0004784), bilirubin oxidase activity (GO:0047705), hydroquinone:oxygen oxidoreductase activity (GO:0052716), and copper ion binding (GO:0005507) (Figure 1C). These above analyses indicated that soybean miRNAs considerably participate in drought response, especially peroxisome pathway.

Correlation analysis of sRNA-seq, degradome-seq, and mRNA-seq between miRNAs and target genes

In order to investigate the miRNAs-mediated drought-response mechanism, transcriptome sequencing was implemented to provide a reliable complement to improve the accuracy of the analysis (Table S1). Firstly, the genomic positions and annotations of the known and novel genes were clarified (Table S5). Continuously, a total of 2 and 55 DEGs at 6 and 12 h were detected for leaf samples, and 6075 and 6761 DEGs were detected at 6 and 12 h for root samples (Table S6). After that, an integrated analysis of sRNA, mRNA, and degradome data in roots and leaves identified 922 and 789 pairs, respectively, of negatively regulated miRNA targets. Amongst these pairs, the reverse expression of only 42 pairs in roots changed significantly more than 1.5-fold (Figure 2A). Furthermore, the expression levels of 10 interesting miRNA targets were analysed to confirm that the genes were negatively regulated by miRNAs, which produced similar expressional patterns with the sequencing results (Figure 2B). Meanwhile, the KEGG analysis indicated that the soybean drought-responsive genes regulated by miRNAs were mainly involved in peroxisome pathway (ko04146) (Figure 1B), which included four DEGs (GmCSD1a/b, GmCSD2a, and GmCCS) associated with GmSOD-related genes. Overall, correlation analyses also suggested that gma-miR398 might function as a hub gene that negatively regulated multiple peroxisome-related genes in soybean plants exposed to simulated drought conditions.

Detection of expression patterns and interaction between miR398 and its target genes

Identification of the characteristics of gma-miR398 and its targets in soybean was a prerequisite to understand the multiple interactions of the miR398-targets module. Firstly, we observed that gma-miR398c/d expression levels were much higher than those of gma-miR398a/b in leaves and roots (Figure 2C). Meanwhile, the abundance of the precursor gma-miR398c (gma-MIR398c) was inhibited more distinctly than that of gma-MIR398d in response to simulated drought stress, thus gma-miR398c might play a more important role in drought resistance in soybean (Figure 2D). Secondly, no differences in the expression of GmCSD1a/b were observed between roots and leaves, whereas GmCSD2a/b/c expression levels were substantially higher in leaves than in roots, which clearly exhibited tissue-specific expression patterns (Figure 2C). These results provide evidence that gma-miR398c might play an important role in the regulation of peroxisome-related pathways.

With an aim to understand the molecular mechanisms of the interaction between gma-miR398c and target genes, a modified 5′ RACE method and a transient GFP-dependent gene expression method were performed to verify the degradome-seq data. The degradome-seq results revealed that GmCSD1a/b, GmCSD2a/b, and GmCCS were regulated by gma-miR398c (Figure S1). Owing to that the interaction sites between gma-miR398c and the three GmCSD2a/b/c genes were conserved, we considered that GmCSD2c was also a potential target for gma-miR398c (Figure S2A). Firstly, the targets of gma-miR398c were validated using a modified 5′ RACE method. Among the above-mentioned genes, GmCSD1a/b, GmCSD2a, and GmCCS were directly identified (Figure S3). However, two GmCSD2b/c were not detected using 5′ RACE, probably because of their relatively low expression levels or translation as a repressor. Notably, absence of the miRNA binding sites (MBSs) of 5′UTR-GmCSD1a-1 and 5′UTR-GmCSD1b-1 prohibited gma-miR398c regulation, whereas transcripts of GmCSD1/2 contained the MBS (Figure S2B), which probably affected the regulation of GmCSD1a/b expression under abiotic stress [21].

Based on the results above, the fluorescence ratios in Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts generated by a transient GFP-dependent gene expression method were evaluated to further characterize the interactions between miRNAs and their targets. We inserted the HBT-sGFP(S65T)-NOS–Targets plasmids (Targets) into Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts prepared from WT, OE-vector, and OE-miR398c plants, and the HBT-sGFP(S65T)-NOS–rTargets plasmids (rTargets) were transformed into OE-miR398c protoplasts as a positive control (Figure 3A). The results displayed that the fluorescence ratios of HBT-sGFP(S65T)-NOS–Targets from OE-miR398c plants were considerably lower than those in the WT, OE-vector, or rTargets plants (Figure 3B). Therefore, these data confirmed that gma-miR398c could negatively regulate GmCSD1a/b, GmCSD2a/b/c, and GmCCS (Figure 3C).

Subcellular localization of GmCSDs and GmCCS proteins

As known, copper-zinc superoxide dismutases (CSDs) are the predominant scavengers of O₂^.− to maintain the ROS balance with the influence of CCS [22]. However, previous research has mainly focused on the proteins and changes in activity of their targets, as the expression and function of these genes in soybean remains poorly investigated [23]. Therefore, the subcellular localizations of GmCSDs and GmCCS were examined for further functional characterization of these genes. Compared with signals of the empty vector in transient transformation assays in Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts, signals of GmCSD1a/b were observed in the cytoplasm, GmCSD2a/b/c and GmCCS signals were predominantly found in the chloroplasts, and no GmCSD3 signals were detected (Figure S4). For the further verifications, GmCSDs and GmCCS were transiently expressed in tobacco leaves that contained NLS and SKL markers (Figure 4). Signals for GmCSD1a/b were detected in the cytoplasm and nucleus, and those for GmCCS were localized in the chloroplasts, nucleus, and cytoplasm. Signals for GmCSD2a/b/c co-localized with NLS were detected in the nucleus and chloroplasts, which was consistent with the predominant expression of these genes in the leaves of soybean (Figure 2C). The co-localization of GmCSD3 with SKL showed that GmCSD3 was expressed in the peroxisome, nucleus, and cytoplasm. Taken together, these results strongly suggested that the gma-miR398c-targeted GmCSDs and GmCCS genes might play an important role in elimination of O₂^.− in cells key organelles.

Phenotypic analysis of OE-miR398c transgenic Arabidopsis under simulated drought conditions

To evaluate whether overexpression of gma-miR398c affected Arabidopsis drought tolerance, a seed germination assay on 1/2 MS medium supplemented with D-mannitol (0, 250, or 300 mM) was performed. The expression levels of gma-MIR398c and the bar gene were distinctly up-regulated in transgenic lines and were not detected in WT plants (Figure 5A). In contrast, the AtCSD1, AtCSD2, and AtCCS expression levels were lower in the transgenic plants than in the WT plants (Figure 5B). The seed germination rates on MS medium (0 mM D-mannitol) were similar in the WT, OE-vector, and OE-miR398c plants. Non-significant differences in percentage seed germination of the WT and OE-vector lines was observed on MS medium supplemented with 250 or 300 mM D-mannitol, whereas the germination frequency and survival rates for the OE-miR398c lines was significantly reduced (Figure 5C, D). In addition, we calculated the percentage survival of plants grown in soil under simulated drought as well as the evaluation of leaf water loss rate. The survival rates of OE-miR398c lines were considerably lower than those of WT and OE-vector plants under the simulated drought condition (Figure 6A, B). The water-loss rate was higher for detached leaves from OE-miR398c lines than for those from OE-vector or WT plants under the water-deficient condition (Figure 6C). These results indicated that overexpression of gma-miR398c decreased the drought tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis plants.

Characterization of gma-miR398c function in soybean

To further assess whether gma-miR398c in soybean may participate in drought regulation mechanisms, Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation of soybean hairy roots with edited gma-MIR398c was performed to evaluate gma-miR398c function. The wilting of OE-miR398c leaves was severer than that of the other lines, whereas the leaves of KO-1 and KO-2 plants grew better than control plants (Figure 7A, B). To evaluate the degree of membrane damage in these leaves, the relative electrolyte leakage and O₂^.− content were measured. The leaves from OE-miR398c plants showed distinctly higher relative electrolyte leakage and O₂^.− production than the leaves of the other lines (Figure 7C, D). Considering that O₂^.− production could affect stomatal closure, we investigated the possible responsible mechanisms. Stomatal aperture measurements showed that stomatal opening of OE-miR398c plants was significantly increased compared with that of control seedlings after stress for 3 h. In contrast, stomatal opening of KO-1 and KO-2 plants was reduced, which was consistent with the leaf O₂^.− contents (Figure 8A). Previous studies indicated that CSDs played a predominant antioxidant role to scavenge O₂^.−, compared with other SODs, under abiotic stress [24, 25]. Then, the expression levels of these genes were analysed by RT-qPCR in the soybean hairy roots. Our results displayed that the expression of gma-miR398c in the hairy roots of OE-miR398c plants was significantly increased, whereas the expressions of GmCSD1a/b, GmCSD2a/b, and GmCCS were distinctly inhibited compared with those of the control plants. In contrast, the expression level of gma-miR398c in KO-1 and KO-2 plants was reduced, and the expressions of its target genes were enhanced (Figure 8B, C). These results indicated that gma-miR398c considerably affected the redox status to reduce the drought resistance of soybean by altering the expression levels of multiple GmCSD1a/b, GmCSD2a/b, and GmCCS genes.

Reprogramming the drought-responsive miRNAs to activate specific target genes is an important molecular mechanism involved in the evolution of drought resistance in plants. The water deficiency status in plants is an important factor associated with drought stress [26]. Previously, sRNA-seq and mRNA-seq have been used separately to investigate the effects of simulated drought stress on soybean plants, and to detect DEMs and DEGs or gene regulatory networks potentially involved in the stress response [5, 27, 28]. However, the molecular mechanism underlying the miRNA–mRNA interactions under water-deficient conditions in soybean remained largely unknown. Thus, we undertook a comprehensive quantitative and qualitative analysis of the complex regulatory mechanisms induced by water deficiency and detected candidate genes.Our findings provide valuable insights to guide future studies on unique regulatory links between miRNAs and their target genes.

Integration of sRNA-seq, degradome-seq, and mRNA-seq revealed gma-miR398c as a hub gene involved in peroxisome

Previous studies indicated that drought treatment mainly induced accumulation of two specific types of ROS, namely H₂O₂ and O₂^.−, resulting in oxidative stress and cell damage [20], which was consistent with GO enrichment and KEGG analysis of soybean miRNA targets from our degradome-seq data. Thus, determining how to utilize soybean miRNAs to activate additional target genes involved in plant defense against oxidative stress will be important for maintenance of ROS homeostasis [29]. Here, we determined that 42 miRNA–target pairs exhibited inversely related expression profiles in roots by integrating the data from sRNA-seq, degradome-seq, and mRNA-seq analyses. Meanwhile, we observed that down-regulated gma-miR398c displayed the function of a hub gene that negatively regulated the expression of multiple peroxisome-related genes (e.g., GmCSD1a/b, GmCSD2a, and GmCCS) (Figure 2B). The enzymes encoded by these target genes represent the first protective barrier that efficiently eliminates free radicals and prevents plants from accumulating ROS to toxic levels [30]. Recent studies have shown that miR398 may positively regulate rice stress tolerance via altering the expression of CSDs to improve total SOD enzyme activity, which is different from its negative role in defense in Arabidopsis, thus it is particularly important to analyse the function of gma-miR398c under drought stress in soybean [14, 15].

Drought-responsive accumulation of GmCSDs and CCSs are affected by gma-miR398c manipulation in soybean

To understand the interaction network of miR398–CSD–CCS module in soybean responses to water deficit, a modified 5′ RACE method and a transient GFP-dependent gene expression assay were performed to identify target transcripts. In a previous study, alternative splicing (AS) of CSD1 in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) resulted in a positive correlation between miR398 and enhanced drought tolerance [21], which may be the reason why the SOD variants generated by alternative splicing might be associated with the spatial-temporal regulation of gene expression. Remarkably, the AS of GmCSD1a-1 and GmCSD1b-1, which lack gma-miR398c binding sites, were detected by 5′ RACE in our data, while the expression levels of GmCSD1a and GmCSD1b genes were still negatively correlated with gma-miR398c (Figure S2B). Therefore, evaluation of individual transcripts from among the present transcriptome data might contribute to elucidation of the drought-responsive mechanism of miRNA-target regulation in soybean. Notably, only CSD1 in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and barley was separately identified using 5′ RACE, which failed to detect other target genes [31, 32]. In our study, we proved that gma-miR398c is capable of interacting with GmCSD1a/b, GmCSD2a/b/c, and GmCCS, probably because of their relatively low expression levels in that tissue or translation as a repressor.

Meanwhile, plant CSDs play an important role in antioxidant systems by scavenging O₂^.−, which is crucial to minimize cell damage caused by excessive accumulation of ROS [24, 25]. Moreover, the activation of different CSDs in Arabidopsis shows varying dependence on CCS [33]. However, the genes encoding SOD-related isoforms in soybean are unwell explored and poorly known [34]. Wang et al. [35] reported that GmCZ-SOD1 (Glyma05g04170) may be important in the adaptive evolution of nitrogen limitation in soybean, whereas it was identified as GmCCS (Glyma.05g055000) encoding a copper chaperone for superoxide dismutase in phylogenetic analysis (Figure S5A). We determined that GmCCS is expressed predominantly in chloroplasts (Figure 4), similar to homologous genes in Arabidopsis [36]. These results might be valuable for further understanding of the redox status under drought stress. Overall, our above data may contribute to claim the evidence of the characteristics of the gma-miR398c regulatory network and to aid in elucidation of drought tolerance mechanisms in soybean.

Drought-responsive gma-miR398c negatively regulated drought tolerance in transgenic plants

In previous studies, overexpressing miR398 negatively regulates plant stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and Nicotiana benthamiana [12, 13]. The Mla and Rom1 loci decrease miR398 expression and increase HvSOD1 accumulation, which confers powdery mildew resistance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) [32]. Loss-of-function mutants of miR398 and overexpression of the miR398-resistant CSD1/2 and CCS indicated that the miR398 regulatory network confers stress tolerance in plants [37, 38]. Recently, overexpression of osa-miR398b and mutants in CSD1 and CSD2 positively regulated plants stress tolerance by altering expression of multiple SODs, indicating that in different plant species miR398 might play different roles in stress resistance [14, 15]. However, there was no direct genetic evidence neither a thorough phenotypic analysis that indicated soybean miR398 was involved in drought resistance. In the current study, gma-MIR398c expression was strongly inhibited in response to drought stress in soybean. Thus, we observed that OE-miR398c Arabidopsis showed significantly inhibited germination and survival frequencies (Figure 5), and the rate of water loss of detached leaves was increased compared with that of WT and OE-vector plants (Figure 6C), which indicated that gma-miR398c may strongly reduce plant drought resistance. Actually, we also analysed the phenotypes of transgenic lines overexpressing other members of the gma-miR398 family but did not observe any differences (data not shown). However, we do not exclude the possibility that other gma-miR398s might also regulate plant stress resistance.

Notably, overexpression of common bean pvu-miR398a, a dicistronic unit co-transcribed by pvu-miR398a and pvu-miR2119, using a common beans transgenic hairy-root system reduced plant stress tolerance by mediating CSD1, and was predicted to regulate the stress resistance of legumes [31]. In soybean, a dicistronic unit co-transcribed by gma-miR398a and gma-miR2119 was also identified, but it showed a low expression level in roots and leaves (Figure 2C), and overexpression of gma-miR398a did not reduce Arabidopsis drought tolerance. Collectively, these results imply that different miR398 family members may have diverse effects in legumes [9]. Therefore, overexpression and knockout essays of gma-miR398c were performed using a soybean hairy-root transformation system. Here, we observed that gma-miR398c expression levels were decreased and GmCSD1a/b, GmCSD2a/b/c and GmCCS genes were elevated in KO-1 and KO-2 plants (Figure 8B, C), similar to findings reported for Arabidopsis miR398 mutants [37]. Recently, mutations in CSD1 and CSD2 led to conferred rice resistance, whereas the CCS mutant displayed lower CSD activity and enhanced susceptibility [14]. In our study, the relative electrolyte leakage, O₂^.−content and stomatal aperture were significantly increased in OE-miR398c plants under simulated drought stress, resulting in reduced drought tolerance (Figure 7, Figure 8A). However, releasing multiple GmCSD1a/b, GmCSD2a/b/c and GmCCS genes from repression by CRISPR/Cas9 editing of miR398c was helpful to scavenge O₂^.− and contributed to increased drought resistance (Figure 7, Figure 8C). Taken together, the present analyses indicated that miR398c in soybean is a strongly negative regulator that reduces plant drought tolerance. Use of the CRISPR/Cas9 system for targeted knockout of gma-miR398c will enable further functional validation of gma-miR398c and will be valuable in molecular breeding to improve the drought tolerance of cultivated soybean.

Correlation analysis of sRNA-seq, degradome-seq, and mRNA-seq revealed a significant induction of gma-miR398c as a hub gene negatively regulates multiple peroxisome-related genes (GmCSD1a/b, GmCSD2a/b/c and GmCCS) in soybean under drought stress conditions. Furthermore, functional investigation confirmed that drought-responsive gma-miR398c could negatively regulate soybean drought tolerance via GmCSDs and GmCCS, not affected by alternative splicing (AS) of CSD1. Further application of the CRISPR/Cas9 system for targeted knockout of gma-miR398c will enhance our knowledge in enable functional validation of gma-miR398c and will be valuable in molecular breeding to improve the drought tolerance of cultivated soybean.

Soybean seedling growth conditions and simulated drought stress treatment

The cultivated soybean seeds of Glycine max (Williams 82) provided by Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences were used for our study. The seeds were surface-sterilized in ethanol for at least 10 min and then washed several times with distilled water. An equal number of seeds were added to pots containing half-strength (1/2) Hoagland’s nutrient solution and incubated at 25°C/18°C (day/night) with a 16-h/8-h (light/dark) photoperiod under photosynthetic photon flux density of 80 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹. Once the first compound leaf had expanded, three replicates of each group were exposed to 7%, 8%, or 9% polyethylene glycol (PEG) 8000 for 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, or 24 h to simulate drought. An untreated (0 h) pot was used as a control. Physiological indices were measured using superoxide dismutase (SOD), malondialdehyde (MDA), and catalase (CAT) detection kits (A001-1, A003-1, and A007-1, Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China). Notice that, the phenotype showed that the leaves of seedlings treated with 9% PEG 8000 were wilted substantially, and the SOD activity and contents of MDA and H₂O₂ were significantly affected at 6 and 12 h (Figure S6). Therefore, all samples of three replicates treated with 8% PEG 8000 at 0, 6, and 12 h were used to prepare RNA libraries.

Total RNA extraction and mRNA, degradome and sRNA library preparation

The RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) experiment was conducted using three replicates. Leaf and root samples were collected from seedlings treated with 8% PEG 8000 for different durations. All samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until analyzed. Total RNA was extracted using the TRIzol^® Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The concentration, purity, and integrity of the total RNA were analyzed using a NanoPhotometer^® spectrophotometer (Implen, Westlake Village, CA, USA), the Qubit™ RNA Assay Kit with a Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Life Technologies, Camarillo, CA, USA), and the RNA Nano 6000 Assay Kit with the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

Transcriptome library construction and sequencing

The mRNA-seq experiment was completed using three replicates of 18 samples for the leaf and root samples collected at 0, 6, and 12 h. The mRNA-seq libraries were prepared from 1 μg RNA per sample. The libraries were sequenced using the HiSeq X™ Ten platform. The paired-end reads were filtered by removing the adapters and low-quality sequences. The remaining high-quality reads were mapped to the Glycine_max.Wm82.a2.v1 reference genome (http://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html). The mapped reads were further analyzed using the TopHat2 software. First, the mapped reads were spliced using the Cufflinks program and new genes were detected by filtering out sequences that encoded short peptide chains (fewer than 50 amino acids) or contained only one exon. Furthermore, the sequences were compared with those of the non-redundant (nr), Swiss-Prot, Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins (COG), Clusters of Protein homology (KOG), and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) databases using the BLASTX online tool. The GO annotations of genes assigned by the Blast2GO software were based on the results of the comparison with nr database protein sequences. KEGG Orthology information for the genes was obtained using KOBAS 2.0 [39]. The amino acid sequences encoded by the genes were compared with protein sequences in the Pfam database using the HMMER program for the annotations [40]. The mRNA levels were normalized based on the fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (FPKM) value. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were detected based on the following parameters: |log₂FC| ≥ 1 with FDR < 0.05 and CPM > 1.

Small RNA sequencing and miRNA identification

For the sRNA-seq experiment, mRNA libraries were prepared for the leaf and root tissues collected at 0, 6, and 12 h. Purified RNA (1.5 μg) was used to construct a sequencing library with the NEBNext^® Ultra Small RNA Sample Library Prep Kit for Illumina^® (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). The libraries were sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform. The resulting paired-end reads were filtered by removing contaminants and low-quality reads, and reads containing poly-Ns and adapters. In addition, sequences shorter than 18 nucleotides or longer than 30 nucleotides were eliminated to ensure the accuracy of all downstream analyses. Using the Bowtie software, the clean reads were mapped based on sequence alignments using the SILVA, GtRNAdb, Rfam, and Repbase databases to filter out ribosomal RNA, transfer RNA, small nuclear RNA, small nucleolar RNA, and other non-coding RNA and repeats. The remaining reads were used to detect known miRNAs based on comparisons with miRNAs in the miRBase database (version 21.0) (http://www.mirbase.org/). The miRDeep-p tool was applied to predict plant novel miRNAs [41]. Potential precursor sequences were obtained by analysing the genomic position information. Based on the distribution of the miRNA characteristics (i.e., mature, star, and loop regions) as well as precursor energy information obtained with the RNAfold and randfold tools [42], we scored the newly identified miRNAs using a Bayesian model. The frequency of the miRNAs in all libraries was expressed as transcripts per million (TPM). The differentially expressed miRNAs (DEMs) were detected based on the following parameters: |log₂FC (fold change)| ≥ 1 with false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 and counts per million (CPM) > 1.

Degradome sequencing, target identification, and data analysis

The leaf and root samples collected at different time points were respectively mixed to obtain two pools for degradome sequencing. The degradome libraries were prepared using approximately 25 μg total RNA from the mixed leaf and mixed root samples [43]. Biotinylated random primers were annealed to poly-A⁺ RNA, which was used as the template. The RNA fragments with the biotin tag were obtained using streptavidin. Only RNAs with 5′ monophosphates were ligated with a 5′ adapter. The resulting RNA fragments were used as templates for first-strand cDNA synthesis. In addition, sequencing primers were designed consistent with the 5′ adapter sequence, which corresponded to the first 50 nucleotides from the 5′ site of the cleaved RNAs. Sequencing (50 bp single-end reads) was performed using the HiSeq 2500 platform. The spliced miRNA targets were identified and classified using the CleaveLand 3.0 pipeline. Putatively identified transcripts were divided into five categories: category 0: more than one raw read at the cleaved site, abundance at the site is equal to the only maximum on the transcript; category 1: more than one raw read at the cleaved site, abundance at the site is equal to a maximum on the transcript and there is more than one maximum; category 2: more than one raw read at the cleaved site, abundance at the site is less than the maximum but more than the median value for the transcript; category 3: more than one raw read at the cleaved site, abundance at the site is less than or equal to the median value for the transcript; and category 4: only one raw read at the cleaved site [44]. The potential target genes were subjected to gene ontology (GO) analysis using the AgriGO toolkit [45].

Verification by RT-qPCR analysis

The total RNA extracted from plants treated with 8% PEG 8000 (0, 6, and 12 h) was used for quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) and stem-loop RT-qPCR analyses of genes (mRNA) and miRNAs, respectively, in accordance with the MIQE standards [46]. All primer sequences were designed and synthesized based on the miRNA and mRNA sequences (Table S7) (Genewiz, Beijing, China). For the RT-qPCR analysis of genes, total RNA samples were treated with RNase-free DNase I to eliminate any contaminating genomic DNA. The RNA was then used as the template for cDNA synthesis with the PrimeScript™ RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara). The stem-loop RT-qPCR analysis of miRNA involved a special step during which 1 µg RNA was reverse-transcribed with PrimeScript RT Enzyme Mix I and miRNA-specific stem-loop primers. The RT-qPCR and stem-loop RT-qPCR were completed using the SYBR^® Premix Ex Taq™ II kit (Takara). We selected GmActin and GmEF1b for RT-qPCR, and gma-miR1520d for stem-loop RT-qPCR as internal controls. The RT-qPCR and stem-loop RT-qPCR experiments were completed with three technical replicates for each biological replicate. Relative expression levels were quantified using the 2^−ΔΔCt method.

Analysis of the interaction between gma-miR398 and their targets

A modified RNA ligase-mediated 5′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) completed with the GeneRacer™ Kit (Invitrogen) was used to examine RNA cleavage. First, the RNA oligo was ligated to 3 µg total RNA from each mixed leaf and mixed root sample. Using random primers, we generated cDNA from the mRNA with the 5′ RACE adapter by reverse transcription. The GSP and GSP-Nested primers from the kit were used to amplify the 5′ end of the cleaved transcript with two gene-specific primers by nested PCR and touchdown PCR. Finally, the nested PCR product was incorporated into the pEASY-T1 vector (Table S7) (TransGen, Beijing, China), inserted into Escherichia coli (DH5α) cells and sequenced.

The Wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana (ecotype Columbia) from Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences was used for all Arabidopsis experiments. Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts were transiently transformed to clarify the interactions between miR398 and their targets [6]. We synthesized four interaction sequences (i.e., for GmCSD1a, GmCSD1b, GmCSD2a/b/c, and GmCCS) and four synonymous mutation sequences and inserted them into the HBT-sGFP(S65T)-NOS vector (Figure S7). Mesophyll protoplasts were extracted from 4-week-old Arabidopsis, wild-type Arabidopsis (WT), empty vector overexpression plants (OE-vector), and gma-miR398c overexpression plants (OE-miR398c). Following DNA-PEG-calcium–mediated transformation [47], the green fluorescent protein (GFP) and chloroplast autofluorescence signals were observed using an IX51 inverted fluorescence and phase contrast microscope (Olympus, Japan).

Subcellular localization of GmCSDs and GmCCS

Firstly, we constructed a phylogenetic tree consisting of GmSOD-related genes to characterize potential members, and 14 distinct open reading frames potentially encoding 13 GmSOD genes and one GmCCS gene were detected in soybean. These genes contribute to the degradation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Figure S5). To determine the subcellular localization of GmCSDs and GmCCS via transient expression in tobacco leaves and Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts, the coding regions were cloned into the pCAMBIA-1302 vector and HBT-sGFP(S65T)-NOS vector for fusion with GFP, respectively (Table S7). The Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EH105 harboring 35S:GmCSDs-GFP, 35S:GmCCS-GFP, or 35S:GFP was separately transformed into tobacco leaves, and a nucleus marker (NLS) [48] and peroxisome marker (SKL) [49] were used to co-localize with functional genes. After 48 h, leaf epidermal cells from transformed tobacco were observed with a confocal microscope (C2-ER, Nikon, Japan). Fluorescence of GFP, chloroplasts, and the markers was stimulated at 488, 640, and 561 nm, respectively.

Generation of transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana and simulated drought stress treatment

The gma-miR398c precursor sequence (gma-MIR398c) was inserted in the pCAMBIA-3301 vector using the BglII and PmlI sites between the CaMV-35S promoter and Nos-terminator. Wild-type Arabidopsis was then transformed with either the empty vector or the vector carrying gma-MIR398c using the EHA105 strain Agrobacterium tumefaciens floral-dip method. Seeds from T₂ transgenic lines exhibiting a segregation ratio of 3:1 and from three homozygous T₃ lines with the highest transgene expression levels were screened on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with BASTA (10 mg l⁻¹ active ingredient).

Arabidopsis seeds were surface-sterilized and imbibed at 4°C for 48 h in darkness. The seeds were then sown on MS medium supplemented with 3% sucrose (w/v), 0.8% agar (w/v), and 250 mM or 300 mM D-mannitol to induce low-water-potential stress. The germination frequency (%) was calculated after treatment for 14 days, and survival rate of Arabidopsis seedlings after 10 days cultivation on 300 mM D-mannitol medium. The plates were incubated at 22°C under a 16-h/8-h (light/dark) photoperiod. For simulated drought treatment of soil-grown plants, an equal number (25:25) of transgenic and WT Arabidopsis plants were cultivated side-by-side in the same container containing soil:vermiculite (7:3) in a greenhouse at 22°C under a 12-h/12-h (light/dark) photoperiod with 50% relative humidity. Importantly, water was withheld from 3-week-old Arabidopsis plants until they wilted (i.e., for at least 3 weeks). The watering of seedlings was resumed and plants were analyzed after 3 days. Water loss was measured using detached leaves collected from 4-week-old Arabidopsis plants. The detached leaves were weighed at 1-h intervals at room temperature (22°C) under normal light with 70% relative humidity. The water loss rate was calculated based on the percentage of the initial fresh weight that remained at different time points. The germination, survival, and water loss rates for five independent replicates of each transgenic line were estimated.

Agrobacterium Rhizogenes-mediated soybean hairy roots transformation and drought stress

The CRISPR/Cas9 vector was obtained from Biogle (Cat#BGK041, Hangzhou, China). Using the web-based tool CRISPR-P (http://crispr.hzau.edu.cn/), sgRNA-1 and sgRNA-2 sequences were designed on the hairpin and mature sequences of gma-MIR398c, respectively. The sequences of sgRNA-1 and sgRNA-2 with their specific primers were cloned into the CRISPR/Cas9 vector including the soybean U6-specific promoter (pCas9-U6-sgRNA) as a knockout vector (KO-1 and KO-2) (Table S7). The pCAMBIA3301-miR398c vector was used as an overexpression vector. The hypocotyls of 5-day-old soybean seedlings were injected with Agrobacterium rhizogenes (K599) harboring the pCas9-U6-sgRNAs or pCAMBIA3301-miR398c plasmid [50]. The seedlings were cultivated in humidity for 6 days, after which the top leaves were removed and the wound sites were covered with vermiculite for about 15 days until hairy roots about 10 cm in length had developed (Figure S8). The seedlings were transferred to 1/2 Hoagland’s nutrient solution for recovery after the original roots were excised. Seedlings of uniform growth with hairy roots were subjected to 6% PEG 8000 for 48 h to induce simulated drought stress. A total of ten independent replicates were performed.

CRISPR/Cas9 activity assessment

To detect the capacity and efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 for editing the precursor sequence of gma-miR398c, sgRNA-1 and sgRNA-2 of different regions were inserted in the CRISPR/Cas9 vector (Figure S9A). PCR primers for genomic DNA from transgenic roots were designed to amplify about 705 bp containing the target site (Table S7). The PCR products were denatured and renatured to produce heteroduplexes. Given the absence of an appropriate restriction enzyme site in gma-MIR398c, the T7E1 (E001L, ViewSolid, Beijing, China) assay was performed to detect CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutations. The mutant sites were identified by subcloning and sequencing. To calculate insertion/deletion (indel) frequencies in accordance with the formula: indel (%) = 100 × a / (a + b + c), where a is the intensity of the undigested band, and b and c are the intensities of the other bands, we measured the gel band intensities with ImageJ [51]. We detected the capacity and efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 for editing gma-MIR398c and identified mutants in 9 and 8 out of 18 independent transgenic hairy roots with indel frequencies ranging from 3.9% to 19.3% and from 2.9% to 10.3%, respectively (Figure S9B). To subclone and sequence the positive PCR products, the indels of mutants at the target sites were conformed (Figure S9C).

Relative electrolyte leakage and superoxide free radical (O₂^.−) assay

After stress treatment for 48 h, the second trifoliate leaf from the shoot apex of control and treated seedlings was used for a relative electrolyte leakage assay. The leaves of 10 seedlings for each treatment were vacuum-infiltrated for 45 min in water, and placed for 1 h at 25°C. The conductivity (R1) was measured. The leaves were then autoclaved for 15 min and shaken until water dropped to 25°C. Relative electrolyte leakage (%) was calculated as the ratio R1/R2. The production of O₂^.− was analyzed following the method of Elstner and Heupel [52].

Stomatal aperture measurement

The composite plants were treated with 6% PEG 8000 for 3 h, and plants were placed in 1/2 Hoagland’s nutrient solution as a control. The stoma of the second trifoliate leaf from the shoot apex of control and treated plants was observed with a Leica TCS-SPE confocal microscope.

Data analysis

Data were subjected to analysis of variance. Student’s t-test was used to assess the significance of differences between the means of two datasets (***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01 and *P < 0.05). The data are presented herein as the mean ± standard deviation.

Online data deposition

The sRNA-seq, degradome-seq, and mRNA-seq raw data have been deposited in the NCBI database SRA (PRJNA407016) and the SRR accession numbers are SRR6122987 to SRR6123012.

Gma-miR398a/b/c/d Glycine max mature gma-miR398s

Gma-MIR398s Glycine max gma-miR398 precursors

GmCSDs Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase genes

GmCCS Copper chaperone for superoxide dismutase genes

5′-RACE RNA ligase-mediated rapid amplification of 5′-cDNA ends

RT-qPCR Reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR

Vector Empty plant expression vector

OE Over-expression transgenic plants

WT Wild-type plants

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All the seeds and plant materials in our study were grown and collected by our team according to institutional and national guidelines, and no field work was performed in our project. Notice that soybean we selected is a common crop cultivar, not the Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora while no voucher specimen of this material has been deposited in a publicly available herbarium.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

Our data sets supporting the results of this study are included within the article and its additional files. Sequencing data used in this manuscript can be found in the NCBI database SRA (PRJNA407016) and the SRR accession numbers are SRR6122987 to SRR6123012.

Competing interests

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest

Funding

This research was financially supported by the Special Program for Research of Transgenic Plants of China (2016ZX08010002–004), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0101005), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31601323), and the Natural Science Foundation of Science Technology Department of Jilin Province (20170101015JC, 20180101028JC and 20190201259JC). The research funders had no role in this study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of this manuscript.

Author contributions

HL and FW conceived and designed experiments. YZ conducted most of the experiments. WL participated RLM-RACE experiments. KF, TK, XL, DS, KX, YD, NW, CF participated data collection. HL and WL wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. Qingyu Wang (Jilin University) and Prof. Xianzhong Feng (Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) for providing experimental materials of Agrobacterium rhizogenes and all wild plant seeds.

1.Stacey G, Vodkin L, Parrott WA, Shoemaker RC: National Science Foundation-sponsored workshop report. Draft plan for soybean genomics. Plant Physiology 2004, 135(1):59–70.

2.Lawlor DW: Genetic engineering to improve plant performance under drought: physiological evaluation of achievements, limitations, and possibilities. Journal of Experimental Botany 2013, 64(1):83.

3.Xu S, Liu N, Mao W, Hu Q, Wang G, Gong Y: Identification of chilling-responsive microRNAs and their targets in vegetable soybean (Glycine max L.). Scientific reports 2016, 6:26619.

4.Li H, Dong Y, Yin H, Wang N, Yang J, Liu X, Wang Y, Wu J, Li X: Characterization of the stress associated microRNAs in Glycine max by deep sequencing. BMC Plant Biol 2011, 11:170.

5.Zheng Y, Hivrale V, Zhang X, Valliyodan B, Lelandais-Briere C, Farmer AD, May GD, Crespi M, Nguyen HT, Sunkar R: Small RNA profiles in soybean primary root tips under water deficit. BMC systems biology 2016, 10(Suppl 5):126.

6.Liu W, Zhou Y, Li X, Wang X, Dong Y, Wang N, Liu X, Chen H, Yao N, Cui X et al: Tissue-Specific Regulation of Gma-miR396 Family on Coordinating Development and Low Water Availability Responses. Frontiers in Plant Science 2017, 8.

7.Ni Z, Hu Z, Jiang Q, Zhang H: Overexpression of gma-MIR394a confers tolerance to drought in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2012, 427(2):330–335.

8.Sunkar R: Posttranscriptional induction of two Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase genes in Arabidopsis is mediated by downregulation of miR398 and important for oxidative stress tolerance. The Plant cell 2006, 8(18).

9.Javed M, Sinha A, Israni Shukla L: Evaluation of mature miR398 family, expression analysis and the post transcriptional regulation evidence in gamma-irradiated and nitrogen stressed Medicago sativa seedlings. International journal of radiation biology 2019, 95(5):585–596.

10.Suzuki T, Ikeda S, Kasai A, Taneda A, Fujibayashi M, Sugawara K, Okuta M, Maeda H, Sano T: RNAi-Mediated Down-Regulation of Dicer-Like 2 and 4 Changes the Response of ‘Moneymaker’ Tomato to Potato Spindle Tuber Viroid Infection from Tolerance to Lethal Systemic Necrosis, Accompanied by Up-Regulation of miR398, 398a–3p and Production of Excessive Amount of Reactive Oxygen Species. Viruses 2019, 11(4).

11.Guan Q, Liao X, He M, Li X, Wang Z, Ma H, Yu S, Liu S: Tolerance analysis of chloroplast OsCu/Zn-SOD overexpressing rice under NaCl and NaHCO₃ stress. PLoS One 2017, 12(10):e0186052.

12.Naya L, Paul S, Valdes-Lopez O, Mendoza-Soto AB, Nova-Franco B, Sosa-Valencia G, Reyes JL, Hernandez G: Regulation of copper homeostasis and biotic interactions by microRNA 398b in common bean. PLoS One 2014, 9(1):e84416.

13.Yan L, Qingqing Z, Jiangguang Z, Liang W, Yijun Q, Jian-Min Z: Identification of microRNAs involved in pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered plant innate immunity. Plant Physiology 2010, 152(4):2222–2231.

14.Li Y, Cao XL, Zhu Y, Yang XM, Zhang KN, Xiao ZY, Wang H, Zhao JH, Zhang LL, Li GB et al: Osa-miR398b boosts H₂O₂ production and rice blast disease-resistance via multiple superoxide dismutases. The New phytologist 2019, 222(3):1507–1522.

15.Li Y, Wang WM: Multiple rice microRNAs are involved in immunity against the blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Plant Physiology 2014, 164(2):1077.

16.Addoquaye C, Eshoo TW, Bartel DP, Axtell MJ: Endogenous siRNA and microRNA targets identified by sequencing of the Arabidopsis degradome. Current Biology Cb 2008, 18(10):758–762.

17.Garg V, Khan AW, Kudapa H, Kale SM, Chitikineni A, Qiwei S, Sharma M, Li C, Zhang B, Xin L et al: Integrated transcriptome, small RNA and degradome sequencing approaches provide insights into Ascochyta blight resistance in chickpea. Plant biotechnology journal 2019, 17(5):914–931.

18.Chen H, Yang Q, Chen K, Zhao S, Zhang C, Pan R, Cai T, Deng Y, Wang X, Chen Y et al: Integrated microRNA and transcriptome profiling reveals a miRNA-mediated regulatory network of embryo abortion under calcium deficiency in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). BMC Genomics 2019, 20(1):392.

19.Chen H, Adam AA, Yu K, Wang A: Genome-Wide Investigation Using sRNA-Seq, Degradome-Seq and Transcriptome-Seq Reveals Regulatory Networks of microRNAs and Their Target Genes in Soybean duringSoybean mosaic virusInfection. Plos One 2016, 11(3):e0150582.

20.Khandal H, Parween S, Roy R, Meena MK, Chattopadhyay D: MicroRNA profiling provides insights into post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression in chickpea root apex under salinity and water deficiency. Scientific reports 2017, 7(1):4632.

21.Park SY, Grabau E: Bypassing miRNA-mediated gene regulation under drought stress: alternative splicing affects CSD1 gene expression. Plant molecular biology 2017, 95(3):243–252.

22.Linda B, Agnès Y, Nicolas B: microRNA-directed cleavage and translational repression of the copper chaperone for superoxide dismutase mRNA in Arabidopsis. Plant Journal 2010, 62(3):454–462.

23.Gomes BR, Siqueira-Soares Rde C, Dos Santos WD, Marchiosi R, Soares AR, Ferrarese-Filho O: The effects of dopamine on antioxidant enzymes activities and reactive oxygen species levels in soybean roots. Plant Signal Behav 2014, 9(12):e977704.

24.Feng X, Lai Z, Lin Y, Lai G, Lian C: Genome-wide identification and characterization of the superoxide dismutase gene family in Musa acuminata cv. Tianbaojiao (AAA group). Bmc Genomics 2015, 16(1):823.

25.Wang W, Zhang X, Deng F, Yuan R, Shen F: Genome-wide characterization and expression analyses of superoxide dismutase (SOD) genes in Gossypium hirsutum. BMC Genomics 2017, 18(1):376.

26.Verslues PE, Agarwal M, Katiyaragarwal S, Zhu J, Zhu JK: Methods and concepts in quantifying resistance to drought, salt and freezing, abiotic stresses that affect plant water status. Plant Journal 2006, 45(4):523–539.

27.Song L, Prince S, Valliyodan B, Joshi T, Jv MDS, Wang J, Lin L, Wan J, Wang Y, Xu D: Genome-wide transcriptome analysis of soybean primary root under varying water-deficit conditions. Bmc Genomics 2016, 17(1):57.

28.Chen W, Yao Q, Patil GB, Agarwal G, Deshmukh RK, Lin L, Wang B, Wang Y, Prince SJ, Song L: Identification and Comparative Analysis of Differential Gene Expression in Soybean Leaf Tissue under Drought and Flooding Stress Revealed by RNA-Seq. Frontiers in Plant Science 2016, 7(244).

29.Zhang C, Shi S: Physiological and Proteomic Responses of Contrasting Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) Varieties to PEG-Induced Osmotic Stress. Front Plant Sci 2018, 9:242.

30.Hu L, Li H, Pang H, Fu J: Responses of antioxidant gene, protein and enzymes to salinity stress in two genotypes of perennial ryegrass ( Lolium perenne) differing in salt tolerance. Journal of Plant Physiology 2012, 169(2):146.

31.De la Rosa C, Covarrubias AA, Reyes JL: A dicistronic precursor encoding miR398 and the legume-specific miR2119 coregulates CSD1 and ADH1 mRNAs in response to water deficit. Plant, cell & environment 2018, 42(1):133–144.

32.Xu W, Meng Y, Wise RP: Mla- and Rom1-mediated control of microRNA398 and chloroplast copper/zinc superoxide dismutase regulates cell death in response to the barley powdery mildew fungus. New Phytologist 2014, 201(4):1396–1412.

33.Huang CH, Kuo WY, Jinn TL: Models for the mechanism for activating copper-zinc superoxide dismutase in the absence of the CCS Cu chaperone in Arabidopsis. Plant Signaling & Behavior 2012, 7(3):428.

34.Ramana GV, Viswanatha CK, Akbar AKP, Shaik JP, Narasimha RP, Mohammad A: Modeling and analysis of soybean (Glycine max. L) Cu/Zn, Mn and Fe superoxide dismutases. Genetics & Molecular Biology 2013, 36(2):225–236.

35.Wang X, Zhang H, Gao Y, Zhang W: Characterization of Cu/Zn-SOD enzyme activities and gene expression in soybean under low nitrogen stress. Journal of the science of food and agriculture 2016, 96(8):2692–2697.

36.Myouga F, Hosoda C, Umezawa T, Iizumi H, Kuromori T, Motohashi R, Shono Y, Nagata N, Ikeuchi M, Shinozaki K: A Heterocomplex of Iron Superoxide Dismutases Defends Chloroplast Nucleoids against Oxidative Stress and Is Essential for Chloroplast Development in Arabidopsis. The Plant cell 2008, 20(11):3148–3162.

37.Dugas DV, Bartel B: Sucrose induction of Arabidopsis miR398 represses two Cu/Zn superoxide dismutases. Plant molecular biology 2008, 67(4):403–417.

38.Leng XP, Wang P, Zhu X, Li X, Zheng T, Shangguan L, Fang J: Ectopic expression of CSD1 and CSD2 targeting genes of miR398 in grapevine is associated with oxidative stress tolerance. Functional & Integrative Genomics 2017(5):1–14.

39.Chen X, Xizeng M, Jiaju H, Yang D, Jianmin W, Shan D, Lei K, Ge G, Chuan-Yun L, Liping W: KOBAS 2.0: a web server for annotation and identification of enriched pathways and diseases. Nucleic Acids Research 2011, 39:316–322.

40.Dan Z, Xi B, Zhu YM, Hua C, Yong LI, Wei JI, Chao C, Lin AN: Isolation and functional analysis of GsTIFY11b relevant to salt and alkaline stress from Glycine soja. Yi Chuan.2012, 34(2):230–239.

41.Yang X, Li L: miRDeep-P: a computational tool for analyzing the microRNA transcriptome in plants. Bioinformatics 2011, 27(18):2614–2615.

42.Bonnet E, Wuyts J, Rouzé P, Van dPY: Evidence that microRNA precursors, unlike other non-coding RNAs, have lower folding free energies than random sequences. Bioinformatics 2004, 20(17):2911–2917.

43.Ma Z, Coruh C, Axtell MJ: Arabidopsis lyrata small RNAs: transient MIRNA and small interfering RNA loci within the Arabidopsis genus. The Plant cell 2010, 22(4):1090–1103.

44.Yang ZM, Chen J: A potential role of microRNAs in plant response to metal toxicity. Metallomics Integrated Biometal Science 2013, 5(9):1184.

45.Tian T, Liu Y, Yan H, You Q, Yi X, Du Z, Xu W, Su Z: agriGO v2.0: a GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community, 2017 update. Nucleic Acids Research 2017, 45:122–129.

46.SA B, V B, JA G, J H, J H, M K, R M, T N, MW P, GL S et al: The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clinical Chemistry 2009, 55(4):611–622.

47.Yoo SD, Cho YH, Sheen J: Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: a versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis. Nature Protocols 2007, 2(7):1565.

48.Kalderon D, Richardson WD, Markham AF, Smith AE: Sequence requirements for nuclear location of simian virus 40 large-T antigen. Nature 1984, 311(5981):33–38.

49.Lee JR, Jang HH, Park JH, Jung JH, Lee SS, Park SK, Chi YH, Moon JC, Lee YM, Kim SY: Cloning of two splice variants of the rice PTS1 receptor, OsPex5pL and OsPex5pS, and their functional characterization using pex5-deficient yeast and Arabidopsis. Plant Journal 2006, 47(3):457.

50.Wei W, Tao JJ, Chen HW, Li QT, Zhang WK, Ma B, Lin Q, Zhang JS, Chen SY: A Histone Code Reader and a Transcriptional Activator Interact to Regulate Genes for Salt Tolerance. Plant Physiol 2017, 175(3):1304–1320.

51.Shan Q, Wang Y, Li J, Gao C: Genome editing in rice and wheat using the CRISPR/Cas system. Nat Protoc 2014, 9(10):2395–2410.

52.Elstner EF, Heupel A: Inhibition of nitrite formation from hydroxylammoniumchloride: A simple assay for superoxide dismutase. Analytical Biochemistry 1976, 70(2):616–620.

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 05 May, 2020

Read the published version in BMC Plant Biology →

Editorial decision: Minor revision
24 Feb, 2020
Review #2 received at journal
18 Feb, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed at journal
28 Jan, 2020
Review #1 received at journal
25 Dec, 2019
Reviewer #1 agreed at journal
12 Dec, 2019
Reviewers invited by journal
11 Dec, 2019
Editor assigned by journal
29 Oct, 2019
Submission checks completed at journal
28 Oct, 2019
Editor invited by journal
28 Oct, 2019
First submitted to journal
26 Oct, 2019

You are reading this older preprint version

Read the latest preprint version →

Integration of sRNA, degradome, transcriptome analysis and functional investigation reveals gma-miR398c negatively regulates drought tolerance via GmCSDs and GmCCS in transgenic Arabidopsis and soybean

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Background

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

Methods

Abbreviations

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Consent for publication

Availability of data and materials

Competing interests

Funding

Author contributions

Acknowledgements

References

Supplementary Files

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1